The prosecution tried to introduce a recorded statement by crawford s wife where she described the stabbing.
Crawford v washington rule.
Because it was pre recorded crawford could not cross examine the statement.
Hundreds of law school topic related videos from.
The jury convicted crawford for assault.
Statement of the facts.
Written and curated by real attorneys at quimbee.
Washington 02 9410 541 u s.
Testimonial statements cannot be used against a defendant who is not given the opportunity to confront the.
Html version pdf version.
36 2004 is a united states supreme court decision that reformulated the standard for determining when the admission of hearsay statements in criminal cases is permitted under the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment the court held that cross examination is required to admit prior testimonial statements of witnesses who have since become unavailable.
The statement contradicted crawford s argument that he stabbed the man in defense of his wife.
36 2004 147 wash.
The new crawford rule.
36 2004 united states supreme court case facts key issues and holdings and reasonings online today.
During crawford s trial prosecutors played for the jury his wife s tape recorded statement to the police describing the stabbing.
Petitioner was tried for assault and attempted murder.
November 10 2003 decided.
Argued november 10 2003 decided march 8 2004.
Syllabus opinion scalia concurrence rehnquist html version pdf version.
Html version pdf version.
Washington case brief rule of law.
2d 424 54 p 3d 656 reversed and remanded.
W here testimonial statements are at issue the only indicium of reliability sufficient to satisfy constitutional demands is confrontation facts.
Crawford was charged with attempted murder and assault of a man who he alleged tried to rape his wife.
The sixth amendment s confrontation clause provides that i n all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right.
Certiorari to the supreme court of washington.
The court permitted the tape recorded statement into evidence.
Petitioner stabbed a man who allegedly tried to rape hi.
The state sought to introduce a recorded statement that petitioner s wife sylvia had made during police interrogation as evidence that the stabbing was not in self defense.
Petitioner was tried for assault and attempted murder.
Every bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below.
Washington supreme court of the united states.
